Re: Instability of phycodorus in pg_upgrade tests with JIT

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Instability of phycodorus in pg_upgrade tests with JIT
Date: 2025-10-15 23:39:03
Message-ID: 1335206.1760571543@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> I have spotted a couple of buildfarm failures for buildfarm member
> phycodorus on REL_14_STABLE and REL_13_STABLE:
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=phycodurus&dt=2025-10-15%2009%3A12%3A36

phycodorus seems to be running a remarkably ancient LLVM version.
I wonder if we should just write these off as "probably an LLVM bug".

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chao Li 2025-10-15 23:52:09 Re: remove partColsUpdated
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2025-10-15 23:24:03 Re: Question about InvalidatePossiblyObsoleteSlot()