On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Gilles Darold <gilles(dot)darold(at)dalibo(dot)com> writes:
> > Then, should I have to use an alternate file to store the information or
> > implement a bidirectional communication with the syslogger?
>
> I'd just define a new single-purpose file $PGDATA/log_file_name
> or some such.
>
Would it make sense to have it as a symlink instead?
--
Alex