Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Getting better Google search results

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Getting better Google search results
Date: 2006-08-29 10:37:55
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-www
Hash: SHA1

> Wouldn't this be better on -www? :-P

I considered that, but this seems more of an advocacy problem
with a technical solution. I thought the wider advocacy audience
might have some ideas about it.

> Don't we have enough silly domains already? If we want to get rid of
> those hits, why don't we just add a robots.txt and tell google not to
> index the old docs at all? (If people *need* hits in the old docs, they
> can always hit our own search engine for those docs)

I considered that, but I would not want to completely eliminate the
old docs from Google searching. There's always a chance something useful is
there. However, since 99.9% of generic non-version specific searches should
*not* hit those pages, it's best to stick those on the "e" in
Goooooooooooooooooooooooogle. :)

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200608290634


In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Robert TreatDate: 2006-08-29 11:50:37
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL rebranding
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2006-08-29 08:11:32
Subject: Re: A counter productive conversation about search.

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Andreas PflugDate: 2006-08-29 11:11:47
Subject: Re: database contest results
Previous:From: Hans-Juergen SchoenigDate: 2006-08-29 10:32:59
Subject: Re: database contest results

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group