| From: | Hans-Juergen Schoenig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: database contest results |
| Date: | 2006-08-29 10:32:59 |
| Message-ID: | 44F417DB.7010600@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have not studied this contest in any detail. However the performance
> differences seem kind of unrealistic:
> http://www.mysql.com/news-and-events/press-release/release_2006_35.html
>
> regards,
> Lukas
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
this is pure marketing.
i have seen postgres beat mysql in many many cases. same with oracle.
i assume that those tests are all done with ISAM. with ISAM everything
is fast but you cannot reboot the box without facing serious corruption.
in business applications stability is as least as important as speed.
as far as the mysql benchmark is concerned: it is like one of those
studies where professor marlboro says that smoking is good for health ...
best regards,
hans
--
Cybertec Geschwinde & Schönig GmbH
Schöngrabern 134; A-2020 Hollabrunn
Tel: +43/1/205 10 35 / 340
www.postgresql.at, www.cybertec.at
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2006-08-29 10:37:55 | Re: Getting better Google search results |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-08-29 07:56:50 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Getting better Google search results |