Re: PostgreSQL rebranding

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL rebranding
Date: 2006-08-29 11:50:37
Message-ID: 200608290750.37526.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

On Tuesday 29 August 2006 03:46, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am collecting a list of PostgreSQL rebrands.
>
> So far I have the following:
>
> Illustra, EnterpriseDB, Bizgres, BizgresMPP, Mammoth, Red Hat Database,
> Netezza, parACCEL
>

Are you looking for PostgreSQL rebrands or POSTGRES (a la Berkely) re-brands?
AIUI Illustra is the latter but not the former.

> I will also try to find out during what time these were offered, the
> company that was behind this offering, the license (BSD, proprietary
> etc.) and to what extend the changes made it back into the PostgreSQL
> tree (none, partially, full).
>
> So throw me whatever names you remember and I will try to research them.
> Of course I would not mind if you can provide links to get the above
> information as well.
>

Powergres is/was offered by SRA as a commercial, threaded windows version of
PostgreSQL. Also NuSphere/Peerdirect released a windows version of
PostgreSQL that iirc was called UltraSQL. There was also "Pervasive
Postgres" which was recently offered by Pervasive. I don't recall if Great
Bridge had such a repackaging, but someone else could probably chime in on
that. HTH.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lukas Kahwe Smith 2006-08-29 11:59:51 Re: PostgreSQL rebranding
Previous Message Devrim GUNDUZ 2006-08-29 11:38:46 Re: 7.4 Development

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2006-08-29 11:59:10 Re: No PWN on planetpostgresql.org
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2006-08-29 10:37:55 Re: Getting better Google search results