Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft
Date: 2020-09-15 13:49:02
Message-ID: 63d3f3aa-e42d-dd3d-643c-2e91a13a0762@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/15/20 5:22 AM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 13:56, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2020-09-09 22:57, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>>> + <listitem>
>>> + <para>
>>> + Parallelized vacuuming of B-tree indexes
>>> + </para>
>>> + </listitem>
>>
>> I don't think B-tree indexes are relevant here. AFAICT, this feature
>> applies to all indexes.
>>
>
> Yes, parallel vacuum applies to all types of indexes provided by
> PostgreSQL binary, and other types of indexes also can use it.

I'm not sure where I got B-tree from. I've attached a correction.

Thanks,

Jonathan

Attachment Content-Type Size
vacuum-doc-fix.patch text/plain 379 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-09-15 14:01:18 Re: Force update_process_title=on in crash recovery?
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2020-09-15 13:49:00 Re: Parallel copy