Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft

From: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft
Date: 2020-09-15 09:22:26
Message-ID: CA+fd4k606sc9y-hcmyqSRdEZMoa6uMAHSLFCdFa4bC_W4FkbwQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 13:56, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 2020-09-09 22:57, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> > + <listitem>
> > + <para>
> > + Parallelized vacuuming of B-tree indexes
> > + </para>
> > + </listitem>
>
> I don't think B-tree indexes are relevant here. AFAICT, this feature
> applies to all indexes.
>

Yes, parallel vacuum applies to all types of indexes provided by
PostgreSQL binary, and other types of indexes also can use it.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message lchch1990@sina.cn 2020-09-15 09:30:22 Re: Unnecessary delay in streaming replication due to replay lag
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2020-09-15 09:19:17 Re: Retry Cached Remote Connections for postgres_fdw in case remote backend gets killed/goes away