Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft
Date: 2020-09-15 14:59:39
Message-ID: 1302074.1600181979@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> On 9/15/20 5:22 AM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 13:56, Peter Eisentraut
>> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I don't think B-tree indexes are relevant here. AFAICT, this feature
>>> applies to all indexes.

> I'm not sure where I got B-tree from. I've attached a correction.

Right, pushed. I clarified the main entry for this a tad, too.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2020-09-15 15:00:50 Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-09-15 14:15:12 Re: pg_restore causing deadlocks on partitioned tables