Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]

From: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla <srinath2133(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org, Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
Date: 2026-03-26 19:36:45
Message-ID: 63637.1774553805@localhost
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla <srinath2133(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 5:30 PM Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
>
>> I could not resist digging in it deeper :-) Attached is a test that reproduces
>> the crash - it includes the isolation tester enhancement that I posted
>> separately [1]. It crashes reliably with v43 [2] if your fix v43-0005 is
>> omitted.
>
> +1, i tested the same and yeah it reproduces the crash ,also reviewed
> the patch LGTM, except i think you need to add this to makefile, so that a simple
> make check would be enough to run the isolation test, i think this all makes sense
> if this [1] patch goes in.

The purpose of this test was only to reproduce the crash you encountered
during the stress test, and to confirm that your fix works. I didn't really
intend to add the test to the tree.

--
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lukas Fittl 2026-03-26 19:51:29 Re: pg_plan_advice
Previous Message Sami Imseih 2026-03-26 19:33:52 Re: Rename LWLockNewTrancheId() parameter from "name" to "tranche_name"