Re: [Proposal] Add accumulated statistics for wait event

From: 王胜利 <attic79(at)126(dot)com>
To: "imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Imai Yoshikazu" <yoshikazu_i443(at)live(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Add accumulated statistics for wait event
Date: 2020-02-25 08:03:12
Message-ID: 61f39736.1399.1707b5f1180.Coremail.attic79@126.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thank you for this update! I will try it.

Best regards,
Victor wang

| |
王胜利
|
|
邮箱:attic79(at)126(dot)com
|

签名由 网易邮箱大师 定制

On 02/25/2020 15:53, imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)fujitsu(dot)com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 11:59 AM, 王胜利 wrote:
> I am glad to know you are working on PG accumulated statistics feature, and I am interested on it.
> I see these two patch file you made, can you let me know which branch of PG code based?
>
> when I use this: https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commits/master, and apply these patches, report some error.

Thanks for Wang's mail, I noticed my 0002 patch was wrong from v3.

Here, I attach correct patches.

Also I will begin to do some benchmark with higher scale and higher number of
users and try to change stats reporting implementation to not affect
performance, which I couldn't have not started because of another tasks.

--
Yoshikazu Imai

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hubert Zhang 2020-02-25 08:06:11 Re: Yet another vectorized engine
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2020-02-25 08:01:23 Re: RS_EPHEMERAL vs RS_TEMPORARY