Re: Replication on the backend

From: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Replication on the backend
Date: 2005-12-06 15:43:10
Message-ID: 60y82yi641.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

gustavotonini(at)gmail(dot)com (Gustavo Tonini) writes:
> But,  wouldn't the performance be better? And wouldn't asynchronous
> messages be better processed?

Why do you think performance would be materially affected by this?

The MAJOR performance bottleneck is normally the slow network
connection between servers.

When looked at in the perspective of that bottleneck, pretty much
everything else is just noise. (Sometimes pretty loud noise, but
still noise :-).)
--
let name="cbbrowne" and tld="cbbrowne.com" in name ^ "@" ^ tld;;
http://cbbrowne.com/info/spreadsheets.html
"When the grammar checker identifies an error, it suggests a
correction and can even makes some changes for you."
-- Microsoft Word for Windows 2.0 User's Guide, p.35:

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-12-06 15:44:36 Re: Oddity with extract microseconds?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-12-06 15:42:53 Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working