Re: Replication on the backend

But, wouldn't the performance be better? And wouldn't asynchronous messages
be better processed?

Thanks for replies,
Gustavo.

2005/12/6, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>:
>
> On 12/5/2005 8:18 PM, Gustavo Tonini wrote:
>
> > replication (master/slave, multi-master, etc) implemented inside
> > postgres...I would like to know what has been make in this area.
>
> We do not plan to implement replication inside the backend. Replication
> needs are so diverse that pluggable replication support makes a lot more
> sense. To me it even makes more sense than keeping transaction support
> outside of the database itself and add it via pluggable storage add-on.
>
>
> Jan
>
>
> >
> > Gustavo.
> >
> > P.S. Sorry for my bad English.
> >
> > 2005/12/5, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>:
> >>
> >> gustavotonini(at)gmail(dot)com (Gustavo Tonini) writes:
> >> > What about replication or data distribution inside the backend. This
> >> > is a valid issue?
> >>
> >> I'm not sure what your question is...
> >> --
> >> (reverse (concatenate 'string "gro.gultn" "@" "enworbbc"))
> >> http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/x.html
> >> "Love is like a snowmobile flying over the frozen tundra that suddenly
> >> flips, pinning you underneath. At night, the ice weasels come."
> >> -- Matt Groening
> >>
> >> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> >> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> >> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that
> your
> >> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> #======================================================================#
> # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
> # Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
> #================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
>