Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres?

From: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres?
Date: 2005-10-31 18:14:57
Message-ID: 60vezda6zi.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

wes_williams(at)fcbonline(dot)net ("Wes Williams") writes:
> Perhaps I'm the only one to actually have read the article?
>
> Oracle 10g Express Edition HAS been available for free for development
> purposes with the previously posted and reviewed limited licenses for quite
> some time now.
>
> The news the zdnet.com article is reporting suggests Oracle WILL, by
> years end, make the same software available for free - even in
> production and commercial use. The Oracle 10g Express Edition is
> still limited software by means of hardware resources available to
> the database and a 4Gb [user] data file limit.

And I daresay that this _can_ be an attractive thing to businesses,
supposing they offer a "production release," gratis.

There are plenty of "departmental applications" out there that involve
limited amounts of data which can fit into the 4GB restriction.

If Oracle provides a way to make it easy and cheap to deploy those, it
can drive a fair bit of future Oracle business.

The fact that it appears "a joke" to people wanting to deploy big
databases doesn't prevent it from taking a painful bite out of, oh,
say, certain vendors that forgot to own their own transactional
storage engine...
--
output = ("cbbrowne" "@" "cbbrowne.com")
http://cbbrowne.com/info/languages.html
Twice five syllables
Plus seven can't say much but
That's haiku for you.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Sugalski 2005-10-31 18:24:05 Re: SQL injection
Previous Message Bill Bartlett 2005-10-31 18:12:50 Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres?