Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres?

From: Richard_D_Levine(at)raytheon(dot)com
To: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres?
Date: 2005-10-31 19:33:07
Message-ID: OF9CCEF991.D772A0D4-ON052570AB.006AB762-052570AB.006B6718@ftw.us.ray.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org wrote on 10/31/2005 01:14:57 PM:

<snip>
>
> And I daresay that this _can_ be an attractive thing to businesses,
> supposing they offer a "production release," gratis.
>
<snip>
True, as long as there is no license clause for future revocation of the
free license at the vendor's whim. Kinda like the M$ clause in their
*open* XML standard. Also, without source, deployments still are under
threat of discontinued support. Kinda like Solaris 9 when Sun said they
didn't know whether the x86 version would be released.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Maldonado 2005-10-31 19:45:55 vacuuming strangeness
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-10-31 19:25:03 Re: Starting PostgreSQL 8.0.4 with more memory [FreeBSD