Re: genomic locus

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gene Selkov <selkovjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: genomic locus
Date: 2017-12-16 14:53:12
Message-ID: 5c72a4f8-00ec-71a0-1d2e-17a36db8c7fe@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/15/2017 05:50 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
>> I have seen a lot of bit rot in other extensions (never contributed) that I
>> have not maintained since 2009 and I now I am unable to fix some of them, so
>> I wonder how much of old knowledge is still applicable. In other words, is
>> what I see in new code just a change of macros or the change of principles?
> APIs in Postgres are usually stable. You should be able to update your
> own extensions. If you want to discuss about a couple of things in
> particular, don't hesitate!

I keep most of the out-of-tree extensions I maintain green by building
and testing them in a buildfarm member. That way I become aware pretty
quickly if any API change has broken them, as happened just the other
day in fact. To do this requires writing a small perl paqckage. There
are three examples in the buildfarm client sources at
https://github.com/PGBuildFarm/client-code/tree/master/PGBuild/Modules
and one of these is included in the buildfarm client releases.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Berg 2017-12-16 15:16:30 Re: Reproducible builds: genbki.pl vs schemapg.h
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-12-16 14:31:33 Re: Backfill bgworker Extension?