Re: Reproducible builds: genbki.pl vs schemapg.h

Re: Tom Lane 2017-12-16 <5525(dot)1513381145(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> >>> As per
> >>> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/postgresql-10.html,
> >>> that's the only place that makes it into the resulting binary.
>
> I'm fairly confused by this claim. Since the string in question is in a
> comment, it really shouldn't affect built binaries at all. I can believe
> that it would affect the non-binary contents of the finished package,

"Binary" in that context was the .deb package file (in contrast to the
.dsc source package).

> In my build, neither one of these files contains any path information;
> I speculate that you need to use a VPATH build to have an issue, or
> maybe Debian's build environment does something even weirder.

This is a VPATH build, yes.

> > It's not like $0 instead of a hardcoded name in the header actually buys
> > us anything afaict.
>
> Agreed so far as the script name goes. However, two out of three of these
> scripts also print their input file names, and I'm suspicious that that
> output is also gonna change in a VPATH build. I'm a little less inclined
> to buy the claim that we're not losing anything if we suppress that :-(

Well, patching this instance of $0 would fix a binary-package
variation in practise. Of course there might be more issues waiting to
come into effect, but I don't see why that would be an argument
against fixing the current issue.

Christoph
--
Senior Berater, Tel.: +49 2166 9901 187
credativ GmbH, HRB Mönchengladbach 12080, USt-ID-Nummer: DE204566209
Trompeterallee 108, 41189 Mönchengladbach
Geschäftsführung: Dr. Michael Meskes, Jörg Folz, Sascha Heuer
pgp fingerprint: 5C48 FE61 57F4 9179 5970 87C6 4C5A 6BAB 12D2 A7AE