| From: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join directly |
| Date: | 2018-02-08 06:06:30 |
| Message-ID: | 5A7BE8E6.200@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
(2018/02/08 10:40), Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> The buildfarm's opinion of it is lower than yours. Just eyeballing
>> the failures, I'd say there was some naivete about the reproducibility
>> of tuple CTIDs across different platforms. Is there a good reason
>> these test cases need to print CTID?
>
> Uggh, I missed the fact that they were doing that. It's probably
> actually useful test coverage, but it's not surprising that it isn't
> stable.
That was my purpose, but I agree with the instability. Thanks again,
Robert!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-02-08 06:14:36 | Disabling src/test/[ssl|ldap] when not building with SSL/LDAP support |
| Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2018-02-08 05:53:38 | Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join directly |