Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join directly

From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join directly
Date: 2018-02-08 05:53:38
Message-ID: 5A7BE5E2.6040306@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

(2018/02/08 5:39), Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 2:58 AM, Etsuro Fujita
> <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> (2017/12/27 20:55), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>>> Attached is an updated version of the patch.
>>
>> I revised code/comments a little bit. PFA new version.
>
> I spent a while reading through this today. I see a few decisions
> here or there that are debatable, in the sense that somebody else
> might have chosen to do it differently, but I don't see anything that
> actually looks wrong. So, committed.

Thanks for committing, Robert! Thanks for reviewing, Rushabh and Ashutosh!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2018-02-08 06:06:30 Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join directly
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2018-02-08 05:44:35 Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem