Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6

From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Date: 2018-01-18 06:40:04
Message-ID: 5A604144.1010708@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

(2018/01/18 7:09), Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 4:08 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> It's debatable perhaps -- I tend to err in the other direction.
>> But likewise, I don't care deeply. Just push it ...
>
> Done.

Thanks for taking the time to work on this issue, Robert and Tom!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Victor Wagner 2018-01-18 06:40:49 Re: master make check fails on Solaris 10
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2018-01-18 05:48:51 Re: Index-only scan returns incorrect results when using a composite GIST index with a gist_trgm_ops column.