Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Date: 2018-01-17 22:09:58
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYXx_uqD2CehQhcT711gMVC1BGFb-Ec1e0ysmzWzjOgww@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 4:08 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> It's debatable perhaps -- I tend to err in the other direction.
> But likewise, I don't care deeply. Just push it ...

Done.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-01-17 22:14:47 Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-01-17 22:01:16 Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support