| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscripting |
| Date: | 2017-09-11 21:45:28 |
| Message-ID: | 5907.1505166328@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On 11 September 2017 at 23:19, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Uh, what? Sure you can. Just because the existing code never has a
>> reason to create such a dependency doesn't mean it wouldn't work.
> Well, I thought that `pg_depend` was not intended to be used from
> user-defined code and it's something "internal".
Well, no, we're not expecting that SQL code will manually insert rows
there. This feature should have some sort of SQL command that will
set up the relevant catalog entries, including the dependencies.
If you don't want to do that, you're going to need the runtime tests.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dmitry Dolgov | 2017-09-11 21:55:01 | Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscripting |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-09-11 21:41:51 | Postponement of v10 release schedule |