| From: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscripting |
| Date: | 2017-09-11 21:55:01 |
| Message-ID: | CA+q6zcXzHbVHzX5HcYBQ1mL9b6d5f=REu3jGVVnfk7wSRGaMfg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 11 September 2017 at 23:45, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >> On 11 September 2017 at 23:19, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Uh, what? Sure you can. Just because the existing code never has a
> >> reason to create such a dependency doesn't mean it wouldn't work.
>
> > Well, I thought that `pg_depend` was not intended to be used from
> > user-defined code and it's something "internal".
>
> Well, no, we're not expecting that SQL code will manually insert rows
> there. This feature should have some sort of SQL command that will
> set up the relevant catalog entries, including the dependencies.
> If you don't want to do that, you're going to need the runtime tests.
Sure, an SQL command for that purpose is much better than a runtime check.
I'm going to add such command to the patch, thank you for the information!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2017-09-11 22:09:20 | Re: PG 10 release notes |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-09-11 21:45:28 | Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscripting |