Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscripting

From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Date: 2017-09-11 21:33:20
Message-ID: CA+q6zcXvhHbs0TxOHYJ92SWLZw0uD+Lz2zraDFJnrNbYi02_PA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 11 September 2017 at 23:19, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Uh, what? Sure you can. Just because the existing code never has a
> reason to create such a dependency doesn't mean it wouldn't work.

Well, I thought that `pg_depend` was not intended to be used from
user-defined
code and it's something "internal". But if I'm wrong then maybe the problem
Arhur raised is a valid reason for that.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-09-11 21:41:51 Postponement of v10 release schedule
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-09-11 21:19:15 Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscripting