| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: How come drongo didn't fail authentication here? |
| Date: | 2022-07-28 15:29:44 |
| Message-ID: | 57fcee8a-f8d1-f719-3213-37462e341cde@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022-07-28 Th 10:55, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> On 2022-07-28 Th 10:24, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> How can that be? Have we somehow broken SSPI authentication
>>> in HEAD?
>> Nothing is broken. On HEAD drongo uses Unix sockets.
> I see. Seems like we've created a gotcha for ourselves:
> a test script can look perfectly fine in Unix-based testing,
> and even in Windows CI, and then fail when it hits the back
> branches in the buildfarm. Is it worth doing something to
> cause the lack of a valid auth_extra spec to fail on Unix?
>
>
Maybe we should just have a windows testing instance that doesn't use
Unix sockets at all.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-07-28 15:39:44 | Re: make update-po@master stops at pg_upgrade |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-07-28 15:23:30 | Re: make update-po@master stops at pg_upgrade |