Re: How come drongo didn't fail authentication here?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: How come drongo didn't fail authentication here?
Date: 2022-07-28 14:55:21
Message-ID: 3408070.1659020121@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 2022-07-28 Th 10:24, Tom Lane wrote:
>> How can that be? Have we somehow broken SSPI authentication
>> in HEAD?

> Nothing is broken. On HEAD drongo uses Unix sockets.

I see. Seems like we've created a gotcha for ourselves:
a test script can look perfectly fine in Unix-based testing,
and even in Windows CI, and then fail when it hits the back
branches in the buildfarm. Is it worth doing something to
cause the lack of a valid auth_extra spec to fail on Unix?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2022-07-28 14:55:47 Re: How to get accurate backup end time when it is taken from synchronous standby ?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2022-07-28 14:36:53 Re: How come drongo didn't fail authentication here?