Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions

From: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions
Date: 2016-06-07 15:54:40
Message-ID: 5756EE40.8060107@proxel.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06/07/2016 05:44 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> cube: I think we need a new extension version.
> hstore: Does not apply for me.
> intarray: Does not apply for me.

Those three and ltree, pg_trgm, and seg depend on my patch with fixes
for the GiST/GIN function signatures in
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/574F091A.3050800@proxel.se. The
reason for the dependency is that I also mark the those functions with
changed signatures as parallel safe.

If that patch is not going to be applied I can easily fix those 6
patches to not depend on the function signature patch.

Sorry for not making this dependency clear.

Andreas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-06-07 16:23:35 Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-06-07 15:44:17 Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions