Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions

From: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions
Date: 2016-05-25 01:25:13
Message-ID: 5744FEF9.4030001@proxel.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/25/2016 02:41 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> wrote:
>> - How should we modify the aggregate functions when upgrading extensions?
>> ALTER AGGREGATE cannot change COMBINEFUNC or PARALLEL. My current patch
>> updates the system catalogs directly, which should be safe in this case, but
>> is this an acceptable solution?
>
> I'd rather extend see us ALTER AGGREGATE to do this.

Wouldn't that prevent this from going into 9.6? I do not think changing
ALTER AGGREGATE is 9.6 materials.

Andreas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Karlsson 2016-05-25 01:29:16 Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions
Previous Message Andreas Karlsson 2016-05-25 01:23:23 Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions