| From: | Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Date: | 2016-04-07 05:45:09 |
| Message-ID: | 5705F3E5.3010805@nasby.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 4/6/16 5:30 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Deciding not to have a compatibility break release means that such
> things will remain forever blocked or we slowly increase the amount of
> old code we have to support all the multiple options needed, which will
> affect bug rates and support costs.
I think that's a pretty hand-wavy statement until the problems have been
documented, along with some thought and estimation of potential
compatible work-arounds.
> I don't really mind what we do, as long as we choose that direction via
> a conscious, rational choice.
Absolutely.
I'll try to start a list on the wiki this weekend, unless someone beats
me to it.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect jim(at)nasby(dot)net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2016-04-07 06:54:24 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2016-04-06 22:30:04 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |