Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e'

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e'
Date: 2016-03-01 13:36:45
Message-ID: 56D59AED.8080300@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/29/16 10:33 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
>> >Given the audience for this, I think it'd probably be OK to just
>> >provide a function that does this, instead of DDL.
> That seems like a promising idea. Can you suggest some possible usage?

pg_extension_dependency( regextension, any )

where "any" would be all the other reg* types. That should be a lot less
work to code up than messing with the grammar.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2016-03-01 13:48:56 TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc
Previous Message Dmitriy Sarafannikov 2016-03-01 13:21:29 Incorrect error message in InitializeSessionUserId