| From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e' |
| Date: | 2016-03-14 18:16:26 |
| Message-ID: | 56E6FFFA.2010508@pgmasters.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Abhijit,
On 3/1/16 8:36 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On 2/29/16 10:33 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
>>> >Given the audience for this, I think it'd probably be OK to just
>>> >provide a function that does this, instead of DDL.
>> That seems like a promising idea. Can you suggest some possible usage?
>
> pg_extension_dependency( regextension, any )
>
> where "any" would be all the other reg* types. That should be a lot less
> work to code up than messing with the grammar.
So where are we on this now? Were you going to implement this as a
function the way Jim suggested?
Alexander, you are signed up to review. Any opinion on which course is
best?
Thanks,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-03-14 18:24:21 | Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification |
| Previous Message | Vladimir Borodin | 2016-03-14 18:15:29 | Re: Improving replay of XLOG_BTREE_VACUUM records |