| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com>, S McGraw <smcg4191(at)mtneva(dot)com>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CoC [Final v2] |
| Date: | 2016-01-25 01:13:03 |
| Message-ID: | 56A5769F.5060403@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 01/24/2016 02:42 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> How do you define “in the Pg community”? Is it someone who has posted to a known forum at least once? Someone who has been to a conference? What if they have never participated in a community forum, but use PostgreSQL at work? Maybe they would eventually submit a bug report or ask a question. How do you gauge that?
>
> Me, I don’t think you can. If someone reports abusive behavior by a member of the Pg community, it should not matter whether or not the person doing the reporting is a member of the community, only that the reported abuser is.
If it can't be defined it can't be enforced. That said, an abuser or
harasser generally has a horrible tendency to do it more than once. If
it happens here, the CoC will apply.
Sincerely,
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-01-25 01:15:54 | Re: CoC [Final v2] |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-01-25 01:11:57 | Re: CoC [Final v2] |