Re: CoC [Final v2]

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>, "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CoC [Final v2]
Date: 2016-01-25 01:11:57
Message-ID: 56A5765D.7030106@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 01/24/2016 02:41 PM, Christophe Pettus wrote:
>
> On Jan 22, 2016, at 6:47 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> == PostgreSQL Community Code of Conduct (CoC) ==
>
> What is missing from this, first and foremost, is a reporting and resolution mechanism. If someone feels the CoC has been violated, who do they talk to? How does that person or entity resolve things? What confidentiality promises are made?

Discussed previously. That is to be resolved once the CoC is complete.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-01-25 01:13:03 Re: CoC [Final v2]
Previous Message rob stone 2016-01-25 00:52:20 Re: A motion