| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
|---|---|
| To: | lars(at)greiz-reinsdorf(dot)de, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Better name for PQsslAttributes() |
| Date: | 2015-11-06 21:38:45 |
| Message-ID: | 563D1DE5.8090002@iki.fi |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/06/2015 11:31 PM, Lars Kanis wrote:
> As a co-maintainer of the PostgreSQL adapter for Ruby, I would like to
> bridge the new SSL related functions to Ruby methods. However I wonder
> whether PQsslAttributes() is the best name for the function. Based on
> this name, I would expect to get key+value pairs instead of only the
> keys. IMHO PQsslAttributeNames() would express better, what the function
> does.
Hmm, I think you're right.
The question is, do we want to still change it? It's a new function in
9.5, and we're just about to enter beta, so I guess we could, although
there might already be applications out there using it. If we do want to
rename it, now is the last chance to do it.
Thoughts? I'm leaning towards changing it now.
- Heikki
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2015-11-06 21:40:10 | Re: Better name for PQsslAttributes() |
| Previous Message | Lars Kanis | 2015-11-06 21:31:52 | Better name for PQsslAttributes() |