Thanx for your answer.
So, if I want XA-support I need postgresql 8.1 at least on the databases I need to use?
I'm using a postgres-ds.xml with XA-support (JBoss config file) which I think you suggested to use (I found it on some jira-related site). Is that all I need to have XA-support/two-phase-commit-support? I mean there is nothing to modify in my code or elsewhere?
Håkan Jacobsson - System Developer
RELEVANT TRAFFIC EUROPE AB, Riddarg 17D, SE-114 57 Sthlm, Sweden
Mobile (+46) 736 56 97 58
Direct (+46) 8 56 24 98 05
Phone to office (+46) 8 678 97 50 || Fax (+46) 8 661 19 22
Från: Heikki Linnakangas [mailto:hlinnaka(at)gmail(dot)com] För Heikki Linnakangas
Skickat: den 7 januari 2008 17:06
Till: Håkan Jacobsson
Ämne: Re: [JDBC] XA Support for Postgres
Håkan Jacobsson wrote:
> I've posted earlier about this. I had problems connecting to the two postgresql databases our company system uses when migrating to JBoss 4.2.2.GA .
> Lots of exceptions about 'Generic JDBC connection can not be created' (something like that).
> I got a solution from a guy here at the mailing list. By using a JBoss database configuration file (postgres-ds.xml) with 'XA-support' we got rid of the exceptions.
> I've tried to search google to understand what this 'XA-support' really does, but I haven't found that much (other than an old thread 'XA-support for Postgres) dating back to 2005.
> Can someone point me to some good documentation for the XA-support for Postgres?
X/Open XA is a standard interface for performing two-phase commit across
different resource managers, like databases.
In Java-world, XA is mapped to the Java Transaction API (JTA). XA
support basically means that the driver comes with an implementation of
the javax.sql.XADataSource interface.
You need two-phase commit if you want to update two databases in a
single atomic transaction.
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Daniel Migowski||Date: 2008-01-07 16:30:09|
|Subject: Re: TypeInfoCache|
|Previous:||From: Christian Schröder||Date: 2008-01-07 16:22:16|
|Subject: Re: Missing fields in getColumns() result|