Re: Missing fields in getColumns() result

From: Christian Schröder <cs(at)deriva(dot)de>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Missing fields in getColumns() result
Date: 2008-01-07 16:22:16
Message-ID: 478251B8.5080802@deriva.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Kris Jurka wrote:
> I think this is the way to go. It avoids all the confusion of
> duplication or splitting it into a half-dozen functions. It's OK for
> a base class to implement more functionality than it needs to make
> life easier for its children.
Please see the attached patch where I have implemented your solution. Is
it what you had in mind?

Regards,
Christian

--
Deriva GmbH Tel.: +49 551 489500-42
Financial IT and Consulting Fax: +49 551 489500-91
Hans-Böckler-Straße 2 http://www.deriva.de
D-37079 Göttingen

Deriva CA Certificate: http://www.deriva.de/deriva-ca.cer

Attachment Content-Type Size
patch text/plain 14.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Håkan Jacobsson 2008-01-07 16:26:11 Re: XA Support for Postgres
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2008-01-07 16:06:00 Re: XA Support for Postgres