Re: Sourceforge

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sourceforge
Date: 2015-05-28 17:11:47
Message-ID: 55674C53.8040109@commandprompt.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


On 05/28/2015 10:06 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Based on this:
>
> https://lwn.net/Articles/646118/
>
> ... it would be great if someone could check on the various mirrors of
> PostgreSQL packages on Sourceforge, and make sure that (a) someone from
> our project still owns them, and (b) they're still offering actual
> Postgres downloads.
>
> Overall, I would suggest that we probably want to disable all Postgres
> content mirrors on Sourceforge. We don't really have the spare time to
> maintain them, and this incident shows that that's a bad situation.

According to SF, this donkey has left the field:

PostgreSQL
A powerful, open source object-relational database system.
Brought to you by: sf-editor, sf-editor1, sf-editor3

Unless someone in our community is an sf-editor.....

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2015-05-28 17:14:33 Re: Sourceforge
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2015-05-28 17:06:13 Sourceforge