| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Sourceforge |
| Date: | 2015-05-28 17:14:33 |
| Message-ID: | 55674CF9.7030104@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 05/28/2015 10:06 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> All,
>
> Based on this:
>
> https://lwn.net/Articles/646118/
Oops, subscriber-only story (I recommend subscribing to LWN, btw).
Here's the background material:
https://plus.google.com/+gimp/posts/cxhB1PScFpe
https://lwn.net/Articles/646180/
https://sourceforge.net/blog/advertising-bundling-community-and-criticism/
https://lwn.net/Articles/564250/
Summary is:
a) Sourceforge has started bundling installers on some projects with
adware, without notifying the downloading users;
b) Sourceforge has started taking over projects which they deem
abandoned, and there is no appeal/reversal of this takeover.
>
> ... it would be great if someone could check on the various mirrors of
> PostgreSQL packages on Sourceforge, and make sure that (a) someone from
> our project still owns them, and (b) they're still offering actual
> Postgres downloads.
>
> Overall, I would suggest that we probably want to disable all Postgres
> content mirrors on Sourceforge. We don't really have the spare time to
> maintain them, and this incident shows that that's a bad situation.
>
>
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2015-05-28 17:20:23 | Re: Sourceforge |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2015-05-28 17:11:47 | Re: Sourceforge |