Re: Sourceforge

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sourceforge
Date: 2015-05-28 17:14:33
Message-ID: 55674CF9.7030104@agliodbs.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 05/28/2015 10:06 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> All,
>
> Based on this:
>
> https://lwn.net/Articles/646118/

Oops, subscriber-only story (I recommend subscribing to LWN, btw).

Here's the background material:

https://plus.google.com/+gimp/posts/cxhB1PScFpe
https://lwn.net/Articles/646180/
https://sourceforge.net/blog/advertising-bundling-community-and-criticism/
https://lwn.net/Articles/564250/

Summary is:

a) Sourceforge has started bundling installers on some projects with
adware, without notifying the downloading users;

b) Sourceforge has started taking over projects which they deem
abandoned, and there is no appeal/reversal of this takeover.

>
> ... it would be great if someone could check on the various mirrors of
> PostgreSQL packages on Sourceforge, and make sure that (a) someone from
> our project still owns them, and (b) they're still offering actual
> Postgres downloads.
>
> Overall, I would suggest that we probably want to disable all Postgres
> content mirrors on Sourceforge. We don't really have the spare time to
> maintain them, and this incident shows that that's a bad situation.
>
>

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2015-05-28 17:20:23 Re: Sourceforge
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2015-05-28 17:11:47 Re: Sourceforge