Re: Sourceforge

From: "Gilberto Castillo" <gilberto(dot)castillo(at)etecsa(dot)cu>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sourceforge
Date: 2015-05-28 18:15:40
Message-ID: 33058.192.168.207.54.1432836940.squirrel@webmail.etecsa.cu
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

>
>
> On 05/28/2015 10:06 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> Based on this:
>>
>> https://lwn.net/Articles/646118/
>>
>> ... it would be great if someone could check on the various mirrors of
>> PostgreSQL packages on Sourceforge, and make sure that (a) someone from
>> our project still owns them, and (b) they're still offering actual
>> Postgres downloads.
>>
>> Overall, I would suggest that we probably want to disable all Postgres
>> content mirrors on Sourceforge. We don't really have the spare time to
>> maintain them, and this incident shows that that's a bad situation.
>
> According to SF, this donkey has left the field:
>
> PostgreSQL
> A powerful, open source object-relational database system.
> Brought to you by: sf-editor, sf-editor1, sf-editor3
>
> Unless someone in our community is an sf-editor.....

This site lock download from Cuba

Saludos,
Gilberto Castillo
ETECSA, La Habana, Cuba

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 179 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ned Lilly 2015-05-28 18:31:59 Re: Sourceforge
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2015-05-28 17:29:49 Re: Sourceforge