Re: [oauth] Increased CPU usage during device flow with libcurl 8.20.0

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Subject: Re: [oauth] Increased CPU usage during device flow with libcurl 8.20.0
Date: 2026-06-15 19:47:42
Message-ID: 555876.1781552862@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> So that just leaves what to do about the current test failures. My
> current idea is to just skip the test if the curl binary reports that
> specific minor version.

Seems like a good solution. We don't know how long such curl
binaries will persist in the wild.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2026-06-15 20:11:16 Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall
Previous Message Tom Lane 2026-06-15 19:36:57 Re: Do quoting more carefully in replication commands