Re: A test for replay of regression tests

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A test for replay of regression tests
Date: 2021-12-11 00:06:08
Message-ID: 5377fe8f-d8ae-bc15-dcfa-d06cc50d2c03@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 12/9/21 15:15, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 2:12 AM Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> The new version appears to set an empty --bindir for pg_regress. Is that
>> right?
> It seems to be necessary to find eg psql, since --bindir='' means
> "expect $PATH to contain the installed binaries", and that's working
> on both build systems. The alternative would be to export yet another
> environment variable, $PG_INSTALL or such -- do you think that'd be
> better, or did I miss something that exists already like that?

No, that seems ok. Might be worth a comment.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2021-12-11 00:17:19 Re: A test for replay of regression tests
Previous Message Colin Gilbert 2021-12-10 23:03:16 Re: Appetite for Frama-C annotations?