Re: A test for replay of regression tests

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A test for replay of regression tests
Date: 2021-12-09 20:15:38
Message-ID: CA+hUKG+C2Uipd8Jw=KACzV1FLMNPsCSrkhFcyGqE7riCnWKPjw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 2:12 AM Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> The new version appears to set an empty --bindir for pg_regress. Is that
> right?

It seems to be necessary to find eg psql, since --bindir='' means
"expect $PATH to contain the installed binaries", and that's working
on both build systems. The alternative would be to export yet another
environment variable, $PG_INSTALL or such -- do you think that'd be
better, or did I miss something that exists already like that?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bossart, Nathan 2021-12-09 20:32:53 Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum?
Previous Message Andres Freund 2021-12-09 19:38:29 Re: A test for replay of regression tests