Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql - additional extra checks

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql - additional extra checks
Date: 2018-03-20 12:35:19
Message-ID: 535af7ee-1f4a-07bf-9c78-553dd895484f@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/20/2018 05:36 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>
> 2018-03-19 21:47 GMT+01:00 Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
> <mailto:tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>>:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking at the updated patch (plpgsql-extra-check-180316.patch), and
> this time it applies and builds OK. The one thing I noticed is that the
> documentation still uses the old wording for strict_multi_assignement:
>
> WARNING:  Number of evaluated fields does not match expected.
> HINT:  strict_multi_assignement check of extra_warnings is active.
> WARNING:  Number of evaluated fields does not match expected.
> HINT:  strict_multi_assignement check of extra_warnings is active.
>
> This was reworded to "Number of source and target fields in assignment
> does not match."
>
>
> fixed
>

OK, thanks. PFA I've marked it as ready for committer.

I think the patch is solid code-wise, but I'm sure it might benefit e.g.
from a native speaker checking the wording of comments and messages.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2018-03-20 12:41:02 Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-03-20 12:31:56 Re: [HACKERS] Add support for tuple routing to foreign partitions