Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Subject: Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why
Date: 2022-09-30 02:16:10
Message-ID: 513312.1664504170@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> Any opinions about whether to do this only in head or backpatch to 15?

HEAD should be sufficient, IMO.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2022-09-30 02:30:54 Re: disfavoring unparameterized nested loops
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-09-30 02:15:19 Re: more descriptive message for process termination due to max_slot_wal_keep_size