Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Subject: Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why
Date: 2022-09-30 02:09:33
Message-ID: 20220930020933.wvnzmk2r6ghta73u@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-09-29 21:24:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > Tom, wasn't there something recently that made you complain about not having
> > coverage around collations due to system settings?
>
> We found there was a gap for ICU plus LANG=C, IIRC.

Using that then.

Any opinions about whether to do this only in head or backpatch to 15?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2022-09-30 02:11:49 Re: Introduce wait_for_subscription_sync for TAP tests
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-09-30 01:24:44 Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why