Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables

From: tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: 曾文旌 <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, Prabhat Sahu <prabhat(dot)sahu(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, 蔡松露(子嘉) <zijia(at)taobao(dot)com>, "Cai, Le" <le(dot)cai(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, 萧少聪(铁庵) <shaocong(dot)xsc(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Date: 2020-03-27 09:21:21
Message-ID: 507b246f-4350-f4af-3950-a334be7c2cf2@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/27/20 10:55 AM, 曾文旌 wrote:
>> Hi Wenjing,
>> This patch(gtt_v21_pg13.patch) is not applicable on PG HEAD, I hope
>> you have prepared the patch on top of some previous commit.
>> Could you please rebase the patch which we can apply on HEAD ?
> Yes, It looks like the built-in functions are in conflict with new code.
>
>
This error message looks wrong  to me-

postgres=# reindex table concurrently t ;
ERROR:  cannot create indexes on global temporary tables using
concurrent mode
postgres=#

Better message would be-

ERROR:  cannot reindex global temporary tables concurrently

--
regards,tushar
EnterpriseDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2020-03-27 09:40:00 Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2020-03-27 08:55:42 Re: error context for vacuum to include block number