Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables

From: 曾文旌 <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>
To: Prabhat Sahu <prabhat(dot)sahu(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "蔡松露(子嘉)" <zijia(at)taobao(dot)com>, "Cai, Le" <le(dot)cai(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, "萧少聪(铁庵)" <shaocong(dot)xsc(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Date: 2020-03-27 05:25:33
Message-ID: 25D7E36F-B2D6-4A63-BFC7-E1FD24EA6BE0@alibaba-inc.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> 2020年3月26日 下午12:34,Prabhat Sahu <prabhat(dot)sahu(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> 写道:
>
>
> Sorry, I introduced this bug in my refactoring.
> It's been fixed.
>
> Wenjing
>
> Hi Wenjing,
> This patch(gtt_v21_pg13.patch) is not applicable on PG HEAD, I hope you have prepared the patch on top of some previous commit.
> Could you please rebase the patch which we can apply on HEAD ?
Yes, It looks like the built-in functions are in conflict with new code.

Wenjing

>
> --
> With Regards,
> Prabhat Kumar Sahu
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com <http://www.enterprisedb.com/>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2020-03-27 05:31:21 Re: backup manifests
Previous Message Andres Freund 2020-03-27 05:06:44 Re: backup manifests