| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Revert online data checksum transitions |
| Date: | 2026-09-16 17:14:06 |
| Message-ID: | 506529.1789578846@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
>> On 16 Sep 2026, at 17:49, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I can poke into it on longfin's host if that would help.
> That would be great, thanks.
What seems to be happening is
(1) pg_control_checkpoint()'s local values[] and nulls[] arrays
are now of length 19.
(2) But the tupdesc that get_call_result_type() builds from the
pg_proc entry still has 20 columns.
(3) Therefore, heap_form_tuple sees a wrong value for the 19th column
(which does no great damage, since it's still a pass-by-value type)
and then fetches complete garbage from values[19] and nulls[19].
Depending on the stack layout and the phase of the moon, nulls[19]
might read as zero or it might not. Either case is fine so long as
heap_compute_data_size and heap_fill_tuple/fill_val interpret it the
same way. However, what I'm seeing as I trace through the crash on
longfin is that nulls[19] has a value that's not either 0 or 1 (not
too surprising), and somehow heap_compute_data_size is interpreting
that as "true" while fill_val is reading it as "false". According
to my understanding of the C standard, fill_val is in the wrong here.
I looked at the generated assembly code and could not spot exactly
what the problem is; it seems to be testing the byte value with
.loc 0 301 7 is_stmt 1 ## heaptuple.c:301:7
testb %al, %al
je LBB3_6
which certainly looks like it ought to treat all nonzero values alike.
Anyway this seems to be a code generation quirk of certain versions of
clang. It's probably not worth chasing further.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jacob Champion | 2026-09-16 17:33:57 | Re: pgsql: Revert online data checksum transitions |
| Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2026-09-16 15:52:31 | Re: pgsql: Revert online data checksum transitions |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | shihao zhong | 2026-09-16 17:20:13 | Re: Add TOAST statistics columns to pg_stat_all_tables |
| Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2026-09-16 17:02:50 | Re: [PATCH] Release replication slot on error in SQL-callable slot functions |