Re: Stabilize recovery conflict stats checks in 031_recovery_conflict.pl

From: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Stabilize recovery conflict stats checks in 031_recovery_conflict.pl
Date: 2026-09-04 04:00:00
Message-ID: 4f3f9ee2-ac33-47a7-96b2-de90fa3c9120@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello Ayush and Fujii-san,

04.09.2026 06:07, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2026 at 6:48 AM Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Thoughts?
> Thanks for the patches! They look good to me.

Thank you for paying attention to my reports!

I'm not sure about the autovacuum fix -- I've found that I tried the same
targeted autovacuum = false as Melanie proposed back then ([1]) and the
test still failed. Please let me recheck carefully if it's still an issue.

Regarding v1-0001, I've tested it with the repro.patch applied and
confirmed it works. Thank you!

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/714729ea-f536-0faf-353b-cbd5c8f241ea%40gmail.com

Best regards,
Alexander

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2026-09-04 04:10:03 Re: [RFC PATCH] Cost-based delayed projection for ORDER BY ... LIMIT
Previous Message Paul A Jungwirth 2026-09-04 03:55:42 Re: FOR PORTION OF silently ignored on views with DO INSTEAD rules