Re: Stabilize recovery conflict stats checks in 031_recovery_conflict.pl

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Stabilize recovery conflict stats checks in 031_recovery_conflict.pl
Date: 2026-09-04 03:07:23
Message-ID: CAHGQGwHkBuZrWBs1rmC84M92Xz+O=PUDMQQiiBorMRf42nMebw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 4, 2026 at 6:48 AM Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thoughts?

Thanks for the patches! They look good to me.

> Although split for review, I think both patches should be
> applied together.

+1

> Backpatch-through: 17

Is this because the test exists in v15 and v16 but is skipped there?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nisha Moond 2026-09-04 03:30:53 Re: Fix resource leak in FindConflictTuple() retry path
Previous Message Ewan Young 2026-09-04 02:38:00 Re: FOR PORTION OF silently ignored on views with DO INSTEAD rules