Re: pg_dump --exclude-table-data

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump --exclude-table-data
Date: 2011-12-14 14:31:45
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/14/2011 06:28 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Not sure that I have a lot to add here, but I am officially listed as
> a reviewer, which is a responsibility that I don't want to shirk.
> In my opinion, this patch is obviously useful. I don't find the
> asymmetry that it will create with pg_restore to be troubling, so I'd
> favour committing it as-is.
> Extremely minor problem noted: There are two spaces at the start of
> one sentence in your SGML doc updates.

Thanks. Committed with that changed, although we seem to be getting
altogether too obsessive about white space, IMNSHO.



In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Cave-Ayland 2011-12-14 14:44:24 Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with 32bit MinGW-w64
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-12-14 14:05:24 Re: Command Triggers